FLAC? Really? Flac is an utter waste of time and storage for a marginally recorded average quality release like this . 192 is more than fine.. What are you uploader, some sort of elitist? Truth is,flac makes virtually no difference in sound quality, when compared to 256 or above. Jeezus.
The author of the above does not possess hi-fidelity playback equipment. If you listen on an ipod or shitty earbuds, of course the qualitative difference of FLAC or WAV or any lossless format is inaudible. On a real system (or hi-fi) the difference is substantial. Ever heard of audio converters? From FLAC you can make it whatever you you want.
5 comments
FLAC? Really? Flac is an utter waste of time and storage for a marginally recorded average quality release like this . 192 is more than fine.. What are you uploader, some sort of elitist? Truth is,flac makes virtually no difference in sound quality, when compared to 256 or above. Jeezus.
chill dude get all2mp3.app
The author of the above does not possess hi-fidelity playback equipment. If you listen on an ipod or shitty earbuds, of course the qualitative difference of FLAC or WAV or any lossless format is inaudible. On a real system (or hi-fi) the difference is substantial. Ever heard of audio converters? From FLAC you can make it whatever you you want.
Lol “this music that you’ve provided for free is in too high a quality for my taste.”
This is you right now.
SteveD, you’re a fucking tool, buddy.